The Reluctant Fundamentalist takes the form of a monologue by the main character, a young Pakistani man who gives up being a successful hot shot analyst in America to return home to Lahore. It's an intriguing book - part character study, part polemic, part love story, part confession - but I'm not sure the whole adds up to the sum of it's parts. It's certainly engaging, beautifully written in parts, and it pulls you quickly along with its one sided conversation - suitably littered with small asides and the chit chat meander of office gossip.
But it's also clunky in places, knocking you out of your stride and making you question how well the illusion will hold up. The most unsubtle cracks appear with the characters names - Changez (the main character), Erica (the American woman he falls for), Chris (her dead ex). Changez is a Muslim changed by the events of 9/11, and as a result wants to change the world. Erica, like America, is beautiful and exciting, but flawed. Chris is the Christ-like figure Erica can't abandon, her unyielding devotion to his memory blinding her to love. For me that's all a bit to simplistic, intrusive and mildly condescending. I just don't think this side of the story added anything substantial to the plot, and diluted what was already a simple and effective premise.
Much more satisfying is the change in Changez brought on by his education and work. Changez had been raised within a Pakistani family which holds a respected place in society, although far less wealthy than it had once been it the family is still proud and carries itself with a certain grace. Changez takes the opportunity to go to America, to excel at Princeton and be head-hunted by a firm that specializes in valuing failing companies. He finds the work easy, the benefits and rewards compelling, but ultimately unsatisfying - the love affair with Erica is merely the glitter of an unattainable bauble with which to accessorize his accomplishments. The parallels between Changez working for a corporation, one that systematically picks apart the carcasses of struggling companies for nuggets of profitability, is neatly contrasted with America's foreign policy. Changez's doubts and uncertainties strike a more resonant chord when they question how squeezing profits from the misfortune of others is morally justifiable.
That the novel was first published in 2007, and the world is a very different broken place today, gives credit to the author's ability to see where unchecked corporate avarice could lead. However, pointing out that greed and self-righteousness is wrong doesn't really make for a compelling (or new) argument unless constructive alternatives are put forth. In the end there's no substantial weight to the novel, and it pulls it's punches when it needs to pull the trigger.